Side-by-side at $1,000,000 qualified income, 37% bracket

FieldGeorgiaSouth Carolina
StatuteO.C.G.A. § 48-7-23 (PTE election); HB 149 (2021)S.C. Code § 12-6-545(G) (election for PTE entity-level 3% tax)
Election deadlineAnnual irrevocable election made by checking the box on a timely-filed (including extensions) Form 700 (partnership) or Form 600S (S corp). Election must be made by the due date or extended due date of the entity return.[PLACEHOLDER: state DOR cite] — pin election timing rules in SC1065/SC1120S instructions.
Rate5.39% flat3.00% flat
Owner creditnon-refundablenon-refundable
Composite interactionstacksstacks
§199A QBI reductionYesYes
Last verified2026-05-112026-05-11

Reference federal-arbitrage computation

Both scenarios assume $1,000,000 qualified net income, a 37% owner federal bracket, and no apportionment. Both reduce §199A QBI base proportionally; net benefit shown is the federal SALT-arbitrage less the rough QBI offset (~20% × bracket × entity tax).

Georgia — entity tax + federal deduction
QBI·GA rate·Bracket= Federal deduction (gross)
$1,000,000×5%×37%=$19,943

Entity-level tax: $53,900. Net of QBI offset (~$3,989): $15,954.

South Carolina — entity tax + federal deduction
QBI·SC rate·Bracket= Federal deduction (gross)
$1,000,000×3%×37%=$11,100

Entity-level tax: $30,000. Net of QBI offset (~$2,220): $8,880.

Why owners with K-1 income across these two states care

Georgia and South Carolina interact in three ways that matter to a multi-state K-1 holder: (1) independent elections — each state's PTET is its own election with its own deadline and form, so a missed GA deadline does not affect SC; (2) aggregate federal deduction — the entity-level tax paid to BOTH states is deductible at the federal entity level under IRS Notice 2020-75, so the federal arbitrage compounds; (3) composite-return interaction may differ — see each state's row above.

Run the multi-state picker pre-filled with both jurisdictions:

Federal anchors